The explosion of online video has pushed the definition of what we mean by consumer-generated media, or as some like to to call it, user-generated content. In my ClickZ column this morning ("The Official CGM Glossary"), I thought I'd take a crack at drawing some key distinctions between what we mean by "pure" CGM versus other forms, including CGM2 (consumer-generated multi-media). Definitions include:
- CGM: Consumer Generated Media (example: unaided review on message board or blog)
- CGM2: Consumer Generated Multimedia (example: "I love my iPod video")
- CFM: Consumer Fortified Media (example: Dove "Evolution" video spot)
- CSM: Consumer Solicited Media or "co-creation" (example: "create your own" Super Bowl ads)
- CCGM: Compensated Consumer Generated Media (benign example: Revver, ugly scenario: PayPerPost meets video)
As I note in the column, there are host of other terms used to describe what's going on the so-called "conversational"
space, especially with the advent of video: social media, user-generated content (UGC), participatory media,
we media, conversation marketing, and more. All are fine, and in some situations they may be
more appropriate.
I tend to emphasize tried-and-true vernacular like "media" and "consumer" with my
clients because it helps bridge understanding much faster and helps the
client sell the vision to higher levels (which is critical to drive organization alignment). For example, I emphasize "media" rather than "content" precisely because CGM acts
like paid media. Whether through search queries or serendipitous
discovery, CGM frequently intercepts other consumers during the
purchase cycle and, coupled with high trust levels, impacts business
results. As for use of the term "consumer," at the end of the day, we're
all answerable and accountable to consumers who try, buy, and judge
our products. The simple distinction between "consumer" (buyer) and
"marketer" (seller/persuader) helps keep us out of the fuzz.
Nice try Pete, but I think you're trying too hard -- especially with the title "The Official CGM Glossary".
There is media generated by consumers (CGM) and there is media generated by entities other than consumers.
That media may be text, it may be audio, it may be photos, it may be video, it may be 3D worlds etc.. The medium doesn't take it out of being CGM even though some mediums are used more frequently for certain kinds of discourse. For example, video has a stronger base of pure entertainment (e.g. stupid videos) than other mediums -- but that doesn't make the medium worth categorizing differently or we risk pigeon-holing something and losing unseen, future value.
There are also a multitude of reasons consumers create media, but they all typically have some form of compensation involved. Compensation can take the form of traffic, notoriety, status, contests, cash, freebies, linkbait, free passes, panel selections, advisory board roles, customers, partners or a multitude of other reasons people take the time/effort to create CGM. It's no different now that consumers are the creators: show me a content creator (consumer or otherwise) who receives no direct or indirect rewards from their efforts, and I'll show you a content pipe that will dry up when the novelty wears off.
Every time I see these naming exercises; whether it involves CGM/UGC or bloggers/journalists, I think people are missing the point that there are millions of reasons people communicate, there are millions of ways they do it and there are millions of things they are trying to say. The people who try to put it in a box usually waste a lot of airtime, hope for linkbait, and get it wrong anyway.
Feel free to market this comment as the New and Improved Official CGM Glossary V2.0 ;-)
Posted by: danrua | March 06, 2007 at 11:26 AM